27 March 2025
National loneliness statistics vary by a factor of two depending on the instrument used. That variation is not noise to be averaged away -- it defines the limits of what the numbers can justify in policy.
by Center for Social Connection · 11 sources
Policy & GovernmentPrevalence & Measurement
19 March 2025
Across national and global surveys, adults under 30 consistently report more loneliness than adults over 65. The pattern is robust; the explanation for it is not settled.
by Center for Social Connection · 14 sources
Prevalence & MeasurementAdolescents & Young Adults
9 March 2025
Surveys consistently put young adults at the top of loneliness rankings, but the same age group is often the least structurally isolated. The literature treats these as one problem, and that conflation has consequences for what gets funded.
by Center for Social Connection · 11 sources
Adolescents & Young AdultsMethods & Data
7 March 2025
A 2010 meta-analysis put the survival benefit of strong relationships at 50%; a 2022 cardiovascular statement put the isolation risk at roughly 30%. The numbers are not in conflict once the outcomes, populations, and estimands are made explicit.
by Center for Social Connection · 5 sources
Health OutcomesMethods & Data
24 February 2025
Gallup's global data and the AARP survey both find loneliness lowest among people 65 and older, the opposite of what most policy narratives assume. The pattern holds, but isolation does not follow the same curve.
by Center for Social Connection · 11 sources
Methods & DataOlder Adults
20 February 2025
The literature on loneliness and mortality has moved past whether an association exists. What varies enormously, and matters more for policy, is the size of that association across studies.
by Center for Social Connection · 8 sources
Evidence ReviewsMethods & Data
9 February 2025
Five years of reviews agree that loneliness and isolation raise mortality and cardiovascular risk. None of them can point to a strong trial base showing what actually reduces that risk.
by Center for Social Connection · 14 sources
Health OutcomesMethods & Data
30 January 2025
Social prescribing is now government policy in the UK and spreading elsewhere, but the trial evidence behind it remains thin. A review of what the systematic reviews actually find.
by Center for Social Connection · 10 sources
Health OutcomesPolicy & Government
27 January 2025
The proposed biological pathway from loneliness to cardiovascular disease rests on decades of correlational data and almost no interventional evidence. A look at what would actually test the mechanism.
by Center for Social Connection · 9 sources
Evidence ReviewsHealth Outcomes
25 January 2025
Most policy on isolation in older adults rests on cross-sectional surveys. A brief look at what that design cannot answer, and what the one randomised trial in the field suggests instead.
by Center for Social Connection · 10 sources
Older AdultsMethods & Data
18 January 2025
The dominant tool for measuring loneliness was validated on college students in the 1970s. Tracing how it spread into national policy explains why so many loneliness statistics don't agree with each other.
by Center for Social Connection · 13 sources
Adolescents & Young AdultsMethods & Data
16 January 2025
Health systems are being told to screen routinely for social isolation and loneliness, often through digital intake tools. The evidence for the screening instrument is solid. The evidence that screening improves outcomes is not.
by Center for Social Connection · 12 sources
Technology & Social MediaHealth Outcomes
10 January 2025
A single composite measure of social relationships and mortality became three distinct risk factors after 2015. The effect sizes shrank, and the constructs stopped being interchangeable.
by Center for Social Connection · 7 sources
Policy & GovernmentMethods & Data