2 May 2023
Government strategies and clinical guidance on social disconnection routinely treat isolation and loneliness as one thing to be measured and fixed together, despite evidence that they carry different risks and require different responses.
by Center for Social Connection · 10 sources
Health OutcomesPolicy & Government
9 April 2023
Surveys tracking loneliness alongside rising smartphone and social media use rarely measure technology use with enough precision to support the causal claims often drawn from them.
by Center for Social Connection · 8 sources
Technology & Social MediaMethods & Data
3 April 2023
The oft-cited statistic that 61% of young adults are seriously lonely is itself an average. The evidence on who is driving that number, and who isn't, is far less settled than the headline suggests.
by Center for Social Connection · 4 sources
Adolescents & Young AdultsPrevalence & Measurement
16 March 2023
A longitudinal Japanese study tracked the same people through 2020 and 2021, letting researchers test a causal story about pandemic isolation rather than just observe a snapshot. What would still be needed to confirm the mechanism.
by Center for Social Connection · 5 sources
Prevalence & MeasurementMethods & Data
7 March 2023
The UK, Japan, and the United States each measure loneliness differently, and the resulting national figures are not comparable to one another, even though all three now inform policy.
by Center for Social Connection · 7 sources
Policy & GovernmentPrevalence & Measurement
26 February 2023
National loneliness policies cite the mortality literature for its statistical significance and rarely for its magnitude. The pooled odds ratios are 1.26 to 1.32, they are larger in samples under 65, and the intervention side of the ledger reports almost no effect sizes at all.
by Center for Social Connection · 17 sources
Older AdultsPolicy & Government
17 February 2023
National loneliness strategies rely almost entirely on self-reported survey instruments. Administrative and network measures of isolation exist but rarely inform policy, and the two kinds of measurement do not track each other cleanly.
by Center for Social Connection · 11 sources
Methods & DataPolicy & Government
9 February 2023
Julianne Holt-Lunstad's 2010 meta-analysis produced a widely cited 50% mortality figure for social relationships. Her 2015 follow-up split the construct into isolation, loneliness, and living alone — and each came out smaller.
by Center for Social Connection · 6 sources
Health OutcomesMethods & Data
5 February 2023
Across several major surveys, young adults report higher rates of loneliness than older adults, even though most policy and research attention has concentrated on the older population.
by Center for Social Connection · 7 sources
Evidence ReviewsOlder Adults
28 January 2023
Holt-Lunstad's 2010 finding that weak social ties carry a mortality risk comparable to established health hazards has travelled from meta-analysis to national strategy. The evidence for what to do about it has not kept pace.
by Center for Social Connection · 12 sources
Technology & Social MediaPolicy & Government
27 January 2023
Most of the evidence linking loneliness and isolation to mortality and cardiovascular disease comes from studies that measure exposure and outcome at nearly the same moment. What that design can and cannot support is worth stating precisely.
by Center for Social Connection · 6 sources
Health OutcomesMethods & Data
13 January 2023
A close look at how the widely cited claim that Americans have far fewer close friends than in 1990 depends on treating two different survey moments as one continuous series.
by Center for Social Connection · 5 sources
Adolescents & Young AdultsMethods & Data
2 January 2023
AARP's finding that a third of adults over 45 are lonely and the National Academies' finding that a quarter of adults over 65 are isolated are often cited interchangeably. They measure different things in different populations.
by Center for Social Connection · 4 sources
Older AdultsPrevalence & Measurement